In a show of unity, residents from Cleveland and its surrounding suburbs have come together to voice their opposition to a proposed monthly gas bill increase of $7.60 by Enbridge Gas. The Public Utilities Commission is currently considering the request, and residents are urging them to reject it.
The proposed increase has sparked concern among residents who are already struggling with financial constraints. Many have expressed that an additional $7.60 per month is significant, especially when considering the essentials it could cover.
Residents voice financial concerns
Essie Williams a Cleveland resident, highlighted the impact of the increase on everyday expenses. “For many of us, an extra $9 or $10 is not small,” she said. “It’s groceries. It’s medicines.”
The harsh winter has left many residents feeling the pinch. Myra Simmons another Cleveland resident, shared her experience. “It was real cold this winter,” she said. “Real, real cold. And the heat that we are getting is not enough heat and we can’t cut it up much higher because it costs too much money.”
The sentiment was echoed by Jennifer Fenton from Lakewood, who questioned the endless cycle of increasing bills. “I mean where does it end?” she asked. “We don’t have money to give you.”
Enbridge gas justifies the increase
Enbridge Gas has stated that the additional funds generated from the increase are necessary for maintaining their systems. Stephanie Moore a spokesperson for Enbridge, emphasized the importance of system reliability. “We want the system to be reliable in the moment when we need it most, and that means that we have to maintain the system,” she said.
However, residents have questioned the necessity and fairness of the increase. Debbie Grale from Seven Hills asked if there are alternative ways for the utility to recoup the needed funds. “I’m not disputing there might be a need to increase charges but are there other ways to recoup?” she inquired.
The impact on fixed portions of bills
The Ohio Consumers’ Counsel has expressed concerns that the increase would apply to the fixed portion of customers’ bills, regardless of gas usage. J.P. Blackwood from the Counsel highlighted the disproportionate impact on smaller households. “That’s the toughest on people with small houses,” he said. “That’s the toughest on people who struggle, and that’s a huge concern.”
Wednesday’s public hearing was one of three scheduled by the Public Utilities Commission to gather feedback on the proposed increase. The next and final hearing is set to take place in Lima on Aug. 31. Enbridge expects a decision from the Commission either later this year or early next year.
Residents who wish to voice their opinions can submit comments to the utilities commission online at www.PUCO.gov. The outcome of this debate will significantly impact the financial well-being of many Cleveland residents.
